According to @TO, the only available information is an X post asking whether a claim is confirmed, with no event details or official source link provided, source: https://twitter.com/TO/status/1999236853107474855. This indicates the status remains unverified and should be treated as a rumor until an authoritative announcement is cited, source: https://twitter.com/TO/status/1999236853107474855. For trading, wait for confirmation from primary sources such as project teams, regulators, or exchanges before positioning, as this post alone does not provide an actionable catalyst, source: https://twitter.com/TO/status/1999236853107474855.

According to @EricCryptoman, a post stating big if true was published on X with no details, assets mentioned, links, or data, providing no verifiable catalyst for trading decisions (source: @EricCryptoman on X, Dec 6, 2025). The message includes no timeline, price targets, or on-chain/market metrics, so it does not constitute an actionable trading signal and should not be used to enter positions without independent confirmation (source: @EricCryptoman on X, Dec 6, 2025). Traders should wait for primary confirmations or official filings before positioning to avoid headline risk from unverified market-moving rumors (source: @EricCryptoman on X, Dec 6, 2025).

According to @AltcoinDaily, an X post on Dec 3, 2025 urged buying Ethereum before a supposed Berkshire Hathaway announcement, but the claim includes no supporting evidence (source: Altcoin Daily on X, Dec 3, 2025). Public Berkshire records provide no confirmation of any Ethereum exposure, and its 2023 Form 10-K filed in Feb 2024 and 2024 quarterly Form 13F reports show no crypto or ETH ETF holdings (source: Berkshire Hathaway 2023 Form 10-K; SEC EDGAR Berkshire Hathaway 2024 Form 13F filings). Warren Buffett has repeatedly criticized cryptocurrencies, indicating a low likelihood of an ETH allocation absent a stated policy change (source: CNBC interview on May 5, 2018; Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting remarks). For trading, buying on an unverified rumor raises headline risk; confirm via SEC Form 13F on EDGAR or an official Berkshire news release before positioning, and use US spot ETH ETFs as the verifiable institutional proxy if exposure materializes (source: SEC Form 13F overview; SEC orders approving US spot ETH ETFs in 2024).

According to @AltcoinGordon, an X post states they heard some huge news regarding $BULLISH with a reveal expected next week. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Nov 8, 2025. The post provides no additional details, confirms no partnership, exchange listing, or roadmap item, and only tags @SolBullishDegen. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Nov 8, 2025. With no official confirmation or specifics in the source post, traders should treat this as an unverified claim and wait for a formal announcement before taking positions. Source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Nov 8, 2025.

According to @PANewsCN, X user @FarzadXBT claimed a CZ-linked wallet sold 35 million ASTER worth $30.42 million, but on-chain analyst EmberCN reported there are no corresponding on-chain transfers for the alleged sell-off. EmberCN added that the three cited ASTER transactions were internal transfers between Binance hot wallets and that wallet 0x889 was falsely presented as CZ’s wallet via edited screenshots. For traders, this debunk means there is no verified large ASTER sell pressure from CZ-linked addresses; treat rumor-driven volatility as FUD and monitor Binance hot wallet flows rather than reacting to doctored images, per @PANewsCN and @EmberCN.

According to @EmberCN, the viral claim that CZ sold 35 million ASTER came from an X post by @FarzadXBT, but the referenced transactions map to Binance hot-wallet internal transfers rather than CZ disposals. source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-10-31; @FarzadXBT on X A review of ASTER token flows on Arkham Intelligence with a filter above 10,000,000 ASTER reveals three large transfers between Binance hot wallets, including address 0x889 that some posts mislabelled as CZ’s wallet. source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-10-31; Arkham Intelligence ASTER explorer at intel.arkm.com/explorer/token/aster-2 There is no on-chain evidence confirming a 35M ASTER sale by CZ at the time of the cited transfers. source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-10-31; Arkham Intelligence ASTER explorer at intel.arkm.com/explorer/token/aster-2 For trading, this means no confirmed new sell-side supply from CZ is evidenced in those transfers, and traders should verify wallet ownership tags and cross-check flows before reacting to rumors. source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-10-31; Arkham Intelligence ASTER explorer at intel.arkm.com/explorer/token/aster-2

According to @rovercrc, an X post on Sep 22, 2025 claims Jack Ma is building a strategic Ethereum reserve and argues there is no reason to be bearish on ETH, positioning the message as a bullish narrative for ETH price action (Source: @rovercrc on X, Sep 22, 2025). According to @rovercrc, the post provides no supporting evidence, on-chain addresses, documents, or official statements to substantiate the claim, so traders should treat it as an unverified social-media input rather than a confirmed fundamental catalyst (Source: @rovercrc on X, Sep 22, 2025).

According to @AltcoinGordon, a post on X dated Sep 14, 2025 claims an additional 1% of SWIF supply will be burned next week, citing an unnamed contact at BlackRock as the source of the information (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 14, 2025). The post provides no supporting evidence such as an official statement, transaction hash, wallet address, or governance notice to validate the claim (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 14, 2025). For trading purposes, the only concrete details contained in the post are the alleged burn size (1%) and the tentative timing window of next week; no exchange notices or on-chain references are included in the post (source: @AltcoinGordon on X, Sep 14, 2025).

According to @rovercrc, a significant rumor is circulating that the U.S. White House may be planning to use the nation's gold reserves to purchase Bitcoin (BTC). If this unconfirmed report proves true, it would represent a monumental policy shift, potentially validating Bitcoin as a primary reserve asset and signaling a major bullish catalyst for the cryptocurrency market. Traders are closely watching for any official confirmation, as such a move could dramatically impact both BTC and gold prices.